I'm fine with that. My RA1's are on their last legs, so I'm taking my old bald R888's in case I cord the RA1's.
If it rains, how about you run the R888's backwards. Don't think anyone would complain about that!
Printable View
I'm fine with that. My RA1's are on their last legs, so I'm taking my old bald R888's in case I cord the RA1's.
If it rains, how about you run the R888's backwards. Don't think anyone would complain about that!
I would bet money that a corded RA1 will STILL be faster than a 888... :shock:Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien
Call me tomorrow and I will tell you what will not be posted here.Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanL
JJ
I have a brand new set of 888's I would like to use for rains, but I still don't now if I would draw a DQ for doing so.
I don't think anyone has an issue with running 888's in the dry because we all know they are slower, but running them in the wet could be advantageous over my slick RA1'S.
If full tread RA1's are legal for the wet, why would you or anyone have issue w/ R888's?Quote:
Originally Posted by AllZWay
I would rather have RA1's for the wet (full tread). More water displacement channels.
WTF mate? can the directors send out a mass e-mail or voicemail if the rule changes but they don't want it in writing?Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowBolt
Why are Directors being brought into this?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremy Gunter
When did you become Australian?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremy Gunter
assuming again...Quote:
Originally Posted by GlennCMC70