Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37

Thread: Helmet Suggestions

  1. #21
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Arlington, TX
    Posts
    1,017
    Fun fact, my composite stilo is lighter than a carbon black armor helmet.
    Tyler Gardner
    CMC #13 2015-2017
    SM #013 2018
    www.dfwmustangs.net

  2. #22
    Senior Member Grass-Passer Suck fumes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Austin, Tx
    Posts
    911
    also double the price. but stilo is pretty amazing!
    “A man with no enemies is a man with no character.”
    ― Paul Newman

  3. #23
    Senior Member Grass-Passer
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Houston, Tx
    Posts
    399
    I've got a Black Armor helmet and really like it. Way more comfortable than the G-Force helmet I had before.

  4. #24

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by ShadowBolt View Post
    I agree with the above statement if purchasing the most expensive helmet is really safer. Can anyone tell me there is a safety difference in a $200.00 helmet and a $3500.00 helmet?


    JJ
    I want the helmet to crack before my noggin. Don't want people sayin, "yeah he's a mort, but the helmet held up good". I approach safety with the goal of decelerating the impact to the driver (crush zones), let the car and safety gear slow down the event. I "assume" but don't know that the SFI rating is derived from destructive G testing and light weight is in line with the Hans technology

    Aviation structural composites haven't been around long enough to gather good life data yet, but it is known that UV is destructive. When the approved inspection procedure for plastic airplanes is to tap on them with a nickel looking for "dead spots" I'd rather ride on a Boeing and suffer the mileage penalty. Helmet is a disposable item. The $3500 helmet might pay off if you are really good looking though.......

  5. #25
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby ShadowBolt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Georgetown, TEXAS
    Posts
    4,268
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by dtanker65 View Post


    I want the helmet to crack before my noggin. Don't want people sayin, "yeah he's a mort, but the helmet held up good". I approach safety with the goal of decelerating the impact to the driver (crush zones), let the car and safety gear slow down the event. I "assume" but don't know that the SFI rating is derived from destructive G testing and light weight is in line with the Hans technology

    Aviation structural composites haven't been around long enough to gather good life data yet, but it is known that UV is destructive. When the approved inspection procedure for plastic airplanes is to tap on them with a nickel looking for "dead spots" I'd rather ride on a Boeing and suffer the mileage penalty. Helmet is a disposable item. The $3500 helmet might pay off if you are really good looking though.......
    Think about the Cirrus SR22 sitting on the ramp month after month year and year. I'm sure most are in hangers since most are so new but who knows in twenty years. I used to regularly fly a 1946 Cub and a 1946 Champ almost every week. Never worried about flying a sixty five year old plane. I'm not sure about the "fast glass" units six decades from now. Guess it will not be my problem since I will not be around but......

    JJ

  6. #26
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby marshall_mosty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Denton, TX
    Posts
    3,333
    Quote Originally Posted by ShadowBolt View Post
    Think about the Cirrus SR22 sitting on the ramp month after month year and year. I'm sure most are in hangers since most are so new but who knows in twenty years. I used to regularly fly a 1946 Cub and a 1946 Champ almost every week. Never worried about flying a sixty five year old plane. I'm not sure about the "fast glass" units six decades from now. Guess it will not be my problem since I will not be around but......
    JJ
    The Boeing 787 (primarily composite by weight) body modules are delivered to Boeing for final assembly pre-painted (white) and the windows are covered until they have interior panels installed to keep the UV light off the composite surfaces.
    Marshall Mosty
    AI/SI Texas Regional Director
    2011 NASA-TX American Iron Champ
    AI #67 "Mosty Brothers' Racing" (RIP)
    ST6 #21 Toyota Corolla (being revived)...

  7. #27
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby RichardP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Friendswood, TX
    Posts
    1,198
    I agree. You shouldn't leave your unpainted helmet outside for decades...

    The interior energy absorbing foam is more sensitive to the elements than the outside shell. Storing your helmet inside your hot, enclosed trailer, for example, isn't the best idea.


    Richard P.

  8. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by ShadowBolt View Post
    I agree with the above statement if purchasing the most expensive helmet is really safer. Can anyone tell me there is a safety difference in a $200.00 helmet and a $3500.00 helmet? If so why don't we all spend $3500.00 for a Arai? Is there anyone that test all or some of the racing helmets where we could see what the higher dollar helmets do different than the low buck units do? Unless the people that say "if you have $100.00 head put it in a $100.00 helmet" are all buying the most expensive helmet they can buy they are still making a decision on what to purchase based on price. I'm going to see if I can find anything on the web about this.


    JJ

    If two helmets meets a certain standard, a helmet company (or salesman for that matter) cannot legally say any one is safer than another. What you're paying for is weight savings, quality of build, and options. One could argue that lighter means less chance of a neck injury and less fatigue through a weekend.

    I had a Zamp on during my crash at NOLA last year. It's basically a copy of a bell with cheaper quality finish. It did it's job. Foam dented around the hard point of impact where my head hit the top/ground in the rollover. (you read that right, I didn't have my lap belts tight enough so I actually bonked the ground, shame on me) Since it was 'totaled' from this, I opted to get a carbon Stilo and can't imagine ever using something else now. The comfort is above and beyond any other helmet I've had. Stilo will condition the removable interior so it doesn't get nasty or too tore up over the course of ~10 years. All the options are available for air, water, and coms.

    The Stilo coms are one of the best selling points. The ear muffs over the ears instead of earbuds are amazing. No more nasty buds, rushing to put them in when the 5 minutes on grid comes, or comfort issues with a bud wiggling out. Just throw the helmet on and the speakers are over your ear. And the sound quality is perfect.

    Definitely try on different helmets. Not all brands have the same fitment.

    Stilo highly recommended. $200/year (~$2k and good for ~10 years) is cheap for something built as quality, comfortable, convenient, and as important as it is.
    Will Faules
    Regional Director - NASA Texas

  9. #29
    I did my initial spin training in a 1946 Cessna 120, but the 20 mph over Vne recovery kinda dampened my enthusiasm for that type of behavior in a 1946 Model. One of the guys asked a Bearcat driver a while ago at OSH how fast it would go and he replied "as slow as possible because, I have to fix whatever I break"

  10. #30
    Senior Member Grass-Passer
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    422
    Blog Entries
    3
    I've had a G-Force for years, and just bought another one to be SA2015 compliant. No complaints... I'm afraid if I try on one of the more expensive helmets I'll like it. Slippery slope this sport is...
    Daniel Records
    CMC # 34

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •