In Aerospace, we use the "Shall"/"Should" argument.
Shall is a direct requirement that will be followed (written rule)
Should is a "it would be nice to comply, but not required" (intent)
http://asq.org/standards-shall-should
In Aerospace, we use the "Shall"/"Should" argument.
Shall is a direct requirement that will be followed (written rule)
Should is a "it would be nice to comply, but not required" (intent)
http://asq.org/standards-shall-should
Marshall Mosty
AI/SI Texas Regional Director
2011 NASA-TX American Iron Champ
AI #67 "Mosty Brothers' Racing" (RIP)
ST6 #21 Toyota Corolla (being revived)...
We should include the intent of each rule in the rule book then. We can then change the name to the great book of guidelines - CMC edition.
We do the shall/should thing at my job as well, I personally don't like it. Why include shoulds from a cost saving perspective? All the shoulds that we purse really should be shalls.
Where do I go to formally request clarification? I have a question about another rule in preparation for nationals.
- Josh
CMC #50
Marshall Mosty
AI/SI Texas Regional Director
2011 NASA-TX American Iron Champ
AI #67 "Mosty Brothers' Racing" (RIP)
ST6 #21 Toyota Corolla (being revived)...
Bookmarks