And just about the time I was recovering from reading the $400 thread... Quite frankly, that thread is filled with pretty much the same BS and rhetoric as this one.
I will comment here to keep it from being assumed that others are speaking for me. I joined NASA and this series because SCCA takes themselves WAAAAYY too seriously for my taste. With that said, there are some here who are probably better suited to compete someplace else.
Here are a few points from my perspective:
I support the manner is which the CMC rules set has been enforced in the Texas region regarding allowing non-compliant cars to race under special circumstances. Fix-It Tickets serve one purpose and one purpose only, every single one of them adds to car count. Also, I believe the position points argument to be irrelevant in an 18 car field.
I support stepped up Tech inspections. Tech is welcome to inspect anything on my car they may so chose to. However, if I have to remove a single bolt then I'll probably take a DQ. Personal choice as I hate working on my car at the track, period.
I support the points made by Mosty and Richard in regards to NASA being compared to LeMons. 2 different business models for 2 different markets.
I support the idea that some minor changes could improve our events.
I thank past and present management along with fellow competitors who worked to build our car count to what is today. Amazing!!!
Boudy