Quote:
Originally Posted by mitchntx
Mitch, I thought you were a member of NAMBLA?
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitchntx
Mitch, I thought you were a member of NAMBLA?
Sorry if I'm a little late - I've been travelling this week.
Class naming everything the same ala AI 1-2-3 seems a lot more confusing than something with different names like Camaro-Mustang-Challenge and Americon Iron to me.
Seems like we're back to square one with three viable classes - CMC - CMC2 - and AI.
When are the rules coming out again? Jerry is itching to bend 'em and Burch is itching to kick everyone's ass with his same old original intent CMC car. Heck, I even gave the CMC2 guys a run for their money in a CMC Fox body for Pete's sake.
Bring on 2009!!!!!!!!
LOL, yep put that reactor in somebody elses back yard.... LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by mitchntx
I'm still gonna build what I want and let yous guys tell me what class I'm in... don't really care about no stinkin' rules, jus wanna run with the V-8 muscle cars!!! like JB said, thats what brings 'em to the fences...
Need to re-read your yearbook. Won't see my picture in there.Quote:
Originally Posted by cjlmlml
Reactors and nuclear waste disposal sites are OK, cockroaches aren't, though. 8)Quote:
Originally Posted by David Love AI27
Reactors and nuclear waste disposal sites are OK, cockroaches aren't, though. 8)[/quote]Quote:
Originally Posted by mitchntx[quote="David Love AI27
Neather the reactor or the waste can kill one...
I'm not itching to bend the rules but I had not heard a thing about what direction we were going. I may go CMC-2 if there are more cars in that class. Either way Team Jordan gave up almost 30 ft. lbs. of tq. in 08 and we are not going to do that again in 09. It may not make any difference in where we finish but it gets old getting pulled by every car on the track.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Liebbe
Any ideas on what help the Mustang is going to get?
I need all the help I can get.
JJ
I thought this was clarified in another thread. My understanding is that the 5.0L guys aren't getting ANY help hp wise (well nothing dramatic like headers or a cam) for the 2009 season for CMC-2. If the directors knew what would work to get up to 260hp, they wouldn't have pushed back the transfer date. If you go run in -2 next year, you WILL get pulled on even harder with the 4th gen guys (since we don't have any 4.6s) running 260hp.
edit...
http://www.aicmctexas.com/forums/vie...256&highlight=
the CMC and CMC-2 merge has been nix'ed. for 2009 - nothing will change for CMC (hp/weight wise). my bet is most all folks will stay CMC for as long as they can. Jerry, i was down almost 15hp. that will change for 2009 for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien
Gary...not true. The rules will clearly state that 302/305 cars wanting to run in cmc2 will be allowed to run parts not specified in the rules in order to reach the power numbers as long as the parts in question are cleared with the directors ahead of time. This is the test mule program which will be defined in a rules supplement document. Its going to take some experimentation, no way around that. Through testing we will develop the list of allowances that will formally be incorporated into the rules. Anyone that wants to is welcome to participate.
If Mitch and Steve stay in cmc2 then that makes four cmc2 cars counting Bryan and Chuck's LS1 cars. I'll for sure run cmc2 if there are four cars there to round out the toyo bucks (glenn is taking good care of my new/old ss ten spokes!)...might stay there all year though. 8)
Glenn...for clarity, the merger was never scheduled to happen in 2009.