My race 4.
https://vimeo.com/110745842
Printable View
My race 4.
https://vimeo.com/110745842
Dan, last race of the season: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whsV...ature=youtu.be
To set this up, this is the battle for second and third in the CMC championship. Mosty clinches the championship in the last race as long as he takes the green flag and doesn't get DQ'd. Dan came into the last event 11 points behind the Jordon's and had gained 12 points on them in the first three races of the weekend. Mathematically, it doesn't matter where either of them finish. Whoever finishes in front of the other gets the second spot in the championship. It's an inverted race with Dan starting second to last, ahead of Mosty. The Jordon's start five places further up. It comes down to a last lap of the season battle for the race win...
Richard P.
WOW! Great driving by both drivers. Tyler and a few others could have at least tried to keep Dan behind them a little while but Jay pulled it off. Very proud Father. Great job of getting through the field Dan.
JJ
Hey now, I kept Dan off for just enough time for Jay to get the W, I still expect that $100 you promised me before the race! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadowBolt
Does anyone know where I can find some photos from the event?
I taught him that pass up the left side of the track on the back straight.Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardP
Great racing guys! Sorry I had to miss it but I would have been 1/2 a lap behind already with the motor running flat.
Here is our view of the start of the AI/SI race1
http://youtu.be/IQz01dXCY7I
An excellent example of wreckless driving, poor car control and out-of-class contact.
Here is our race 2 from Spec Iron. I don't usually post full races but this was fun to watch.
http://youtu.be/f06nuvaGjS4
Yikes!!!! That looked expensive.Quote:
Originally Posted by cobra132
Here is our Race 3 video some interesting battles.
http://youtu.be/aVhHDySvM04
Anyone else find it funny that most of the recommended videos that come up at the end of that video are pictures of Life Flight helicopters?.... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by JMR81
I'll give you that , but I wasn't slandering you , last time you smashed into my brand new car.Quote:
Originally Posted by cobra132
Well now I feel compelled to defend myself.
I wasn't attempting to pass, nor was I attempting to race out of class. I moved into a clearing on the start and as I gained forward visibility I was surprised to see that my closure rate exceeded my ability to stop , so I made a decision to bail instead of punt. I take full responsibility for my mistake . I understand I'm not the only car who was surprised at how much we slowed for turn 1, but I'm the one who had contact. For that I'm very sorry!
Smashing into your brand new car??? So in other words, lookout mid-pack slackers.
No I'm saying that I wasn't talking trash when you crashed into the back of me at TWS.Quote:
Originally Posted by cobra132
Do you have video of your ECR wreck? It looked like a wild ride.Quote:
Originally Posted by NASA13
I'am not sure what the definition of "smashed" or "crashed" is, I suppose there is a spectrum. The blemish I have includes a rear quarter panel caved in 11 inches, a crimped fuel fill, a broken wheel, bent axel, trashed door, repairable front fender and bent tie rod on first inspection. That's all i'am going to say on this, just another thunder racing incident.
I'll go ahead and throw the fuel on the fire. There are those that seem to be able to run fast and in traffic without incident and then there are others who cannot. We all know examples of each group. The recklessness needs to be deemed unacceptable and dealt with appropriately and with more than a slap on the wrist. If this is not done, AI/CMC/SI will get a bad reputation. Heck, even the Spec Miata races I've seen lately are cleaner than AI/CMC/SI. If the group wants to be reckless, then I'll consider other options for the new car.
Thunder was the worst group for incidents in 2014.
A higher percentage of these incidents occurred during the inverted races.
Do we need to stop the inverts?
Do we need a 13/13 rule...?
Excuse my ignorance but what is 13/13 rule?
First incident = 13 month probation.
Second incident while on probation = 13 month suspension.
We need public data. Any reason we can't post up all the contacts in '14? To you vets, is there a "difference" in terms of scoring ability/consequence depending on how/why an incident occurred?Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeP99Z
You have my permission to post any incident I was/have been involved in. I believe I would benefit from hearing more (not less) about contact events, what happened, what could have been done differently, etc.
I like the inverts and want to keep them. Hell, I like the full field inverts the best. Not opposed to a 13/13 kind of rule either.
All,
Let me discuss this with Will, Adrian, and Glenn to see if we can gather all the contact forms and put a running tally of contact for each driver, outcome, and points that were assigned to each incident (for both drivers).
Not for this to be a public "tar and feathering", but if you want to stay off the public list, race clean...
I know that I should have three on my log for this year...
1. MSR-H, deemed at fault during contact with Mark L. in R1.
2. MSR-C, hit from behind by Jack Murray in rattlesnake. Deemed a racing incident.
2. TWS (April), deemed at fault (overdrive into 11) and hit Mark Smith
Rob, thunder already has that reputation and has for the last 5 years. We hear it a lot as we hang out with the other groups and a lot of upcoming drivers.
In blitz, I have been labeled "dangerous" by few of the drivers because I came from thunder.....granted those few folks are not real important but the point is that the reputation is already there and following the group.
Good to see y'all are taking a look into this but IMHO, its a bit late.
I have always said the inverts are dangerous and a bad idea which is why I don't run them. I've participated in maybe 3-4 of them all of which have resulted in a new dent on my car. And it wasn't because I was being overly aggressive, it's because people do t watch their mirrors or simply don't care and like to block. Now there is always someone who loves the inverts and thinks they are the best thing ever invented but those are the guys that don't have to start DFL in the inverts. They are not a good idea especially in large groups. There is a reason why the other groups don't do them.
That is simply not true.... I raced for many years with ZERO contact in inverts. Patience is the key to no contact in inverts.
The inverts are the most fun races. You have to learn to race with folks you don't always know what how they react.
This should be a thread of it's own... more ECR video would be nice, but since we're on a roll...
Yup, wouldn't want to have really large fields, or long races where traffic management comes into play... might as well just TT and issue DQs and ejections for any contact.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suck fumes
Aaron, I understand your sentiment but it IS racing. If we have decided that there is again too much contact, then as a group let's provide evidence and education to the group.
But I'll not let stand a double standard of "hey, it was in a group of 5 Show Ponies and one of them took my nose off but we were racing for the win" versus "that rookie backmarker got swamped and should have seen me when I stuffed it inside them, and then had to dive off track to avoid them, spun and get collected."
You tell me where the line is: if you haven't seen the video from TWS the 5 and 70 are racing into T1, a hard defensive move, contact and lost position. Behind them the 55 moves several feet to the left and hits the 39 broadside. 4 cars racing - 2 separate incidents, arguably 4 levels of driver skills - how do you call it after the fact?
I'm perfectly fine with strengthening and enforcing more penalties - but i will not put up with a driver taking advantage of another driver because of it.
Ok, propose a solution - we all like easy but what if the inverts scored points based on position gained without contact instead of overal finishing order, tie would go to the car starting farthest to the rear. Winner gets a win - biggest mover gets the points.
Patience in a 15min sprint race is hard to come by :-/Quote:
Originally Posted by AllZWay
Make the inverts 30m races?
When I posted the video from Eagle Canyon I never envisioned the discussion taking this direction. It seems there is no other video to show what was going on and why the situation developed the way it did. Every contact that Jack has been involved this year except for one whether he was giving or receiving at fault or not took place on lap one. If you look at the videos available you almost always see the lead SI cars in the mix with the AI cars by turn one the exception being TWS CCW. Imho it appears that the group representative for
AI/CMC/SI although SI doesn't have a representative were caught off guard by the performance of the SI cars. I don't race anymore but I watched all of the AI/SI races and the close proximity of the SI cars to the AI cars on the start both standing and rolling is too close. I've watched video of almost every start this year from Jacks car and its almost the same every race msrh, msrc, twscw, hallett,ec are the same. You throw in the inverts and it's multiplied,faster cars coming up on slower cars at the start and somebody gets hit somebody bails and then hits another car coming back on the track. It's a problem that's created by not allowing enough spacing between groups. Increase the space between groups. I also feel the the length of the race contributes to some of the incident whether its an Si car flying through the dirt at eagles canyon or a AI car punting a SI car in turn 4 at TWS or cars going 3 wide through rattlesnake after they have been asked not too, every one trying to get to the front on the first lap.
Look at the qualifying times for the SI cars compared to the AI cars one row between them is not a sufficient gap for a standing start and on the rolling start whoever sets the pace in SI need to recognize when they are too close. One solution would be to grid based on qualifying time, we did that one time this year and it worked fine with AI/SI cars why we didn't continue I don't know. I think Marshall, Glenn and whoever else is a decision maker should take a look at how the races are started. Contact is going to happen, why it happens isn't always black and white. The 13/13 is great for something like TT. If you had it in SM you wouldn't have anyone left at the end of the year.
I think if you were to post the contact forms with names and car numbers deleted so that every one can see what happened would be beneficial. Putting up an offenders list is useless except to embarrass some one. We've never named anyone who hit us in a public forum and never will.
For all you fans of the inverted start I've stated before I'm not a supporter , Jack he doesn't care one way or the other, Lets have a real invert and put CMC in front and see how that works out for every one. ;)
any way my 2 cents just an opinion.
Navigating traffic is not the issue. I've done this long enough to know how to race clean and pass people safely. I'm not afraid or against going through traffic. The biggest issue is blocking. There is a big difference in protecting your line ahead of time and waiting till the guy is next to you then moving over to block. After all like you said the inverts don't count for points so why block? Especially blocking out of class cars. I can't tell you how many times SI cars get stuck behind an AI car that doesn't want to admit he is slower than a car with 100 less HP and has too big of an ego to let them by when they earn the spot but then get motored down the straight then parked in the turns.
I don't make boneheaded moves or take chances on passes I know I can't make either....cough Corey.... Cough cough! Haha.
I'm all for hard racing but when you have a very short race and everyone is fighting to get to the front from the back it gets a little rediculous.
Everybody can make a mistake or have a mechanical issue that causes an incident. Like some have said, that's racing. However, if we see trends or repeated bad behavior by a driver or drivers, be it poor skills, red mist, lack of patience or stuff always falling off of their car, action needs to be taken.
Holy shit , I hope you're joking , otherwise your keyboard has made you lose your mind again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Suck fumes
I've had contact three times in 11 years.
I have video of you having serious contact at least five times just this year. I may have a reputation for being crazy , but I always keep the mindset that all accidents are avoidable and I always try to have a couple escape strategies, sometimes I fail . I've raced all of you long enough , I think you know this, because my escape routes have saved most of you at least once.
I'm blown away by this shit