Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: All AI drivers in here...2008 Rules are out.

  1. #1
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    College Station, TX
    Posts
    4,578

    All AI drivers in here...2008 Rules are out.

    Ok gang, we need everyone to go to the national board and voice their strong objections to the new rules allowing 18" wheels and 14" brakes in AI. I already sort of showed my ass on a couple posts about it trying to draw out more folks to actually post objections. It seems that there is a group of 8 to 10 folks that normally post over there and are just perfectly happy to go spend another few thousand dollars to keep up the pace in AI. I know this isn't the case with 90% of the racers in AI and JWL needs to hear it.

    What I am more concerned about is the possibility Toyo isn't going to make an R888 in a 275/40/17... Think about that considering the 18" version is $100 more per tire. Looks like 17" cobra R's are about to become REALLY cheap. Also, 18" rims are pretty well limited to CCW's, 2000R's and other high line wheels where the entry price is about a grand per set at a minimum.

    Stand up for your wallets!
    Ah, fugg it.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Grass-Passer cobra132's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    648
    What about the width. What are they going to allow. If the limit is a 275 then its less of a factor. If they allow wider, larger tires then everyone is screwed. FMR

  3. #3
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby donovan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    1,236
    I posted just after JWL posted... he suggested a weight minumum for the combo... I tossed out 3500#

    if you look at the Nationals spreadsheet, none off the AI cars there were over 3500#, the list below is from fastest to slowest cars.

    3080
    3272
    3423
    3228 David D.
    3357
    3356
    3459
    3148
    3121
    3130
    3369
    3243
    3285
    3130
    3294
    3292
    3166
    3279
    3256
    3292
    2928

  4. #4
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    College Station, TX
    Posts
    4,578
    David, excellent data points. However, the "heavy pig" scenario was tossed out that 3200lbs should be the cutoff earlier in another thread. I say 3400# would be fine but what it sounds like is that the guys bringing S197's and CTSV's to the track are just being lazy about removing weight from the cars because the motors put out too much power. So instead of removing weight and detuning the motor, they want bigger brakes...fine, just don't let a 2700 lb AI car run them. I think the higher min weight to run 18" and 14" brakes is an acceptable solution as a start that might need further modification once it is implemented and tested for a few races. Keep in mind though that Dave Capps' 05 with a 351 in it only weighed like 3200 lbs at the last event he ran! Irwin's car was much heavier because he was making nearly 400 ft/lbs of torque!

    Also, as stated on the national forum, there is a 14" brake package that will work in a 17" wheel...just not an off the shelf package for the newer cars.

    I am glad to see the responses over there and JWL to recognize it's not what the series wants.
    Ah, fugg it.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Grass-Passer oz98cobra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Plano, TX
    Posts
    401
    I think 3500 is too high - for me, 3300 would be the sweet spot for now - that will give the "heavy pigs" what they are asking for with a big enough buffer that the lightweights are not at a disadvantage.

    Anyone with an SN95 or Fox whose car weighs 32??, and thinks 3300 is not enough of a buffer can easily drop some weight (and HP if necessary?) to get closer to the acknowledged 3000lb "sweet spot" for our class. They would gain a lot more than just better brake performance!
    Daron
    AI75 DownUnder Racing

  6. #6
    Senior Member Site AdminGrass-Passer cjlmlml's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    730

    Wheels

    I sent him an email objecting to 18's
    AI # 12

  7. #7
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    College Station, TX
    Posts
    4,578
    Looks like JWL has acknowledged the flubb and is taking the weight point into consideration. Also, keep in mind the 14" brakes are already legal with 17" rims...just not practical at this point as the rims are $300+ each.

    Thankfully, the wheels (nice pun) are turning in the right direction...but it would have been better to discuss this prior to the rules release to save some grief...
    Ah, fugg it.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby GlennCMC70's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ft. Worth
    Posts
    6,448
    Blog Entries
    1
    Matt, take an extra pill today. you earned it. :wink:

  9. #9
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    College Station, TX
    Posts
    4,578
    Quote Originally Posted by GlennCMC70
    Matt, take an extrat pill today. you earned it. :wink:
    Thanks Glenn but I wasn't the only one that got a little heated today. Overall, I think we are going to get what we were looking for....
    Ah, fugg it.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby marshall_mosty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Denton, TX
    Posts
    3,333
    Quote Originally Posted by AI#97
    ...just don't let a 2700 lb AI car run them. I
    Hey... I resemble that remark.

    I can hardly fit my 13" under my 17" wheels, much less the 14's.
    Marshall Mosty
    AI/SI Texas Regional Director
    2011 NASA-TX American Iron Champ
    AI #67 "Mosty Brothers' Racing" (RIP)
    ST6 #21 Toyota Corolla (being revived)...

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •