Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: American Iron 2007 Rules Question (D/S Loop)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby marshall_mosty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Denton, TX
    Posts
    3,333

    American Iron 2007 Rules Question (D/S Loop)

    Ref. AI 2007 Rules Ver 7.1 (November 2006) Section 5.6

    Could the welded in Griggs torque arm mounting bar also act as a driveshaft safety loop? It's welded in versus bolted for the standard D/S loop.

    I believe that the T/A bar is more than capable of "retaining the front end of the driveshaft in the event of a universal joint failure."

    The current mount I have would be difficult to install due to packaging contraints that I have with the T/A and the exhaust.
    Marshall Mosty
    AI/SI Texas Regional Director
    2011 NASA-TX American Iron Champ
    AI #67 "Mosty Brothers' Racing" (RIP)
    ST6 #21 Toyota Corolla (being revived)...

  2. #2
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Spring, TX
    Posts
    3,005
    As long as your setup can demonstrate that it could restrain the driveshaft in the event of a 360 degree failure , it'll suffice. (exhaust H-pipe doesn't count.)

    -=- Todd

  3. #3
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby marshall_mosty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Denton, TX
    Posts
    3,333
    Todd,
    I guess I don't understand a 360 degree failure... Unless you mean that the standard D/S loops encapsulates the driveshaft 360 degrees.

    I believe the intent of the rule is to keep the D/S from falling to the ground and po-go sticking into the ground. Correct?

    If so, as long as I can show retention downwards, would that meet the intent of the rule?

    Basically the floorboard and frame rails will hold the D/S on top and the T/A mount will hold it on the bottom and side-to-side.
    Marshall Mosty
    AI/SI Texas Regional Director
    2011 NASA-TX American Iron Champ
    AI #67 "Mosty Brothers' Racing" (RIP)
    ST6 #21 Toyota Corolla (being revived)...

  4. #4
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby GlennCMC70's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ft. Worth
    Posts
    6,448
    Blog Entries
    1
    in 2005 Tony G said the stock bolt on factory stamped plate found on a 4th gen just behind the trans cross member was all that was required.
    i think your good Marshall.

  5. #5

    2 piece?

    I am still running the stock 2-piece on my car.
    From a letter of the rule perspective I would only need the front retained right? From a safety perspective I would think I need front and back so I am probably going to do that before ECR - I won't be swapping drive shafts before next year.

    Just curious about my interpretation.

  6. #6
    Its only the front of the driveshaft that needs to be contained.
    Al Fernandez

  7. #7
    Senior Member Carroll Shelby
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    College Station, TX
    Posts
    4,578
    Quote Originally Posted by Al Fernandez
    Its only the front of the driveshaft that needs to be contained.
    he poses and interesting point though...since the shaft is two piece, should there be a second one supporting the front of the rear half of the shaft should the slip yoke fail? typically on older trucks that had this same two piece shaft, that is where the ujoint would break or the slip yoke would split and give up the ghost. Just a thought!
    Ah, fugg it.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •