David, please explain how the tire change effected platform parity in your eyes.

I've given a pretty damn accurate account of the timeline and results we saw for the 4 years since the rules change. This was also accompanied by a logical and reasonable explanation to what happened to GM wins and why they dwindled each year to present. Some guys just don't want reasonable, they don't want logical analysis unless it agrees with them.

What in the eyes of the slighted would actually prove your point here? What markers or results would actually satisfy the perceived grievance? I've stated many times here that, "If we can prove my car needs 25 lbs, then I certainly don't want 50. If we can prove it needs nothing then I'll STFU." We've since got access to data from both platforms, what more is needed? Mosty got his ass kicked in 2012 by Proctor at a 2:1 margin and the data backed it up. So again, WHAT'S THE DESIRED RESULT OF THIS TREAD? Everything needed to substantiate or squash the complaint is painfully obvious and has been provided.

Boudy